JAMIA Open

In this work, we demonstrate the unprecedented value of NIH's "All of Us Research Program" (AoURP) dataset in studying maternal morbidity and building predictive machine learning (ML) models across heterogeneous populations in the United States. We developed robust and data-driven preprocessing pipelines to curate a longitudinal, multi-site, multimodal, and demographically diverse pregnancy dataset (20,253 subjects; 27,525 pregnancy episodes) from AoURP data, using electronic health records (EHR) (Conditions, Labs, Measurements) and survey responses (Social Determinant of Health (SDoH)), focusing on 7 crucial maternal health adverse outcomes. After characterizing data quality, missingness, and heterogeneity, we performed statistical correlation analysis to identify risk factors. We subsequently developed XGBoost and sequential LSTM models to predict the adverse outcomes, reaching state-of-the-art performance for multiple outcomes. We conducted model interpretability post-hoc analysis to understand success points and fairness analysis to evaluate implications for socio-economic disparities. Four practicing physicians reviewed the set of statistically significant and ML model identified features to assess their clinical validity and novelty. Most features identified through either statistical correlations or ML feature importance analysis aligned with known clinical risk factors. Several features were identified that the ML models used but that are not currently used in clinical practice and may merit further clinical investigation. Fairness analysis revealed certain associations with SDoH and age highlight areas that warrant continued monitoring. Overall, we demonstrate that meaningful populational level patterns can be extracted, and high-performing machine learning models can be trained on this longitudinal, diverse, multi-site dataset. Important risk features, particularly novel ones identified, if validated, could inform new strategies for maternal care or enable development and validation of outcome-specific, clinically deployable ML models.

The openEHR standard provides an open, vendor-neutral architecture for clinical data repositories (CDRs), yet its real-world deployment has not been systematically documented. We conducted a dual-perspective survey combining a vendor survey of openEHR CDR providers with a community survey of openEHR practitioners. Eleven vendor organisations reported deployments across 22 countries and over 100 institutions and health regions. A complementary community survey (n=29, 17 countries) provided context on regulatory environments, adoption drivers, and barriers. Combined, the surveys cover 28 countries, 26 of them with a reported openEHR CDR deployment. Three findings emerge: openEHR has achieved national-scale presence through two distinct channels. Through vendor-market convergence, openEHR-based systems cover the majority of regional health authorities without a national mandate, including 19 of 21 Swedish regions, 3 of 4 Norwegian health regions, and 16 of 21 Finnish wellbeing services counties. Through national health record adoption, governments have built or procured national systems on openEHR as their technical foundation, including Ireland, Malta, Greece, Jamaica and Slovenia. Across Europe, this constitutes an openEHR-based interoperability infrastructure already in place across multiple EU member states. We identified no country in which openEHR is named in binding national regulation, creating structural fragility and an unrealised opportunity for alignment with the European Health Data Space (EHDS). Second, 61% of deployments serve primary use only, and 12% support both primary and secondary use. Third, lack of openEHR-specific knowledge is the most consistent adoption barrier across all geographies and deployment tiers. Adoption is driven by practitioner need and innovation, not by regulatory mandate.

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a frequent complication within intensive care units, with its sudden onset often missed. This is especially important because a timely window for intervention is required as delayed detection leads to progressively worse outcomes. Existing machine learning and deep learning models have contributed to closing this gap, but their complexity, requiring hundreds to thousands of features, and lack of generalisation pose a limitation that prevents them from being integrated into clinical workflows across different electronic health-record ecosystems. This study presents a 37-feature XGBoost model trained on the MIMIC-IV dataset with 5.4% positive cases, with hyperparameters optimised via Optuna and probabilities calibrated using isotonic regression, designed for transportability across clinical settings. Validation was conducted internally using a temporal patient-level split simulating prospective deployment, training on 2008-2016 data and testing on 2017-2022 data"External validation was performed on the eICU Collaborative Research Database, a multi-centre dataset spanning 208 US hospitals, using the trained model without retraining. SHAP TreeExplainer was used to provide feature-level explainability for individual predictions. Internal testing yielded an AUROC score of 0.794 for predicting AKI onset within a 12-24 hour window. External validation produced a 0.750 AUROC without retraining. Equitable discrimination was observed across gender, age, chronic kidney disease presence, race, and AKI stages on both datasets, with a 95% internal CI of 0.789-0.799 confirming the model's estimate stability. These results suggest that clinically useful prediction systems are achievable with substantially fewer features than current models require.

Routine childhood growth surveillance is a cornerstone of pediatric care. Growth pattern abnormalities are often early manifestations of chronic disease. Yet subtle abnormalities are frequently underrecognized, leading to diagnostic delays and avoidable morbidity. We introduce SPROUT (System for Pediatric Recognition Of Undiagnosed Trajectories), a generalized, multi-agent large language model (LLM) reasoning system designed to identify a broad spectrum of pediatric growth-related conditions from longitudinal electronic health records (EHRs) earlier than standard clinical practice. Using a large pediatric primary care EHR dataset, we developed and validated SPROUT as a two-stage system. First, a highly specific LLM screener flags concerning longitudinal growth patterns. Second, an Orchestrator module coordinates a multidisciplinary panel of LLM agents to generate a ranked differential diagnosis. To correct systemic reasoning errors, a Trainer module injects meta-knowledge into the panel via a dedicated "Learner" agent. Diagnostic capability was evaluated using a walk-forward, visit-by-visit simulation leading up to the diagnosis date. The SPROUT screener model achieved 98% (83/85) specificity and 28% (9/32) sensitivity on a gold-standard dataset of pediatric primary care patients when evaluated one year before the index date, and 100% specificity and 47% sensitivity when evaluated using longitudinal data up to the day of diagnosis. When applied to 300 control patients (i.e., healthy or undiagnosed), the screener flagged 15. Subsequent expert panel review confirmed high suspicion for undiagnosed pathology in 33% (5/15) of these cases. In chronological walk-forward validation on disease cases, the diagnostic engine identified conditions well before standard-of-care documentation. One year prior to clinical diagnosis, the system achieved sensitivities of 81% for type 1 diabetes mellitus, 56% for pituitary disorders, and 44% for celiac disease. The SPROUT multi-agent system demonstrates the ability to detect a significant portion of latent growth-related pediatric conditions months to years before current clinical standards while minimizing false positives. These results support its potential as a decision support tool for reducing diagnostic delays in pediatric care.

Antimicrobial resistance is a public health challenge, driving the need for rapid, cost-effective diagnostic support tools. Artificial intelligence (AI) may enable prediction of susceptibility to untested antibiotics from known susceptibility results, but prospective clinical validation is required before routine use. We evaluated an AI-based decision support method, trained on invasive isolates from the European Surveillance System (TESSy), for prediction of antibiotic susceptibility in clinical Escherichia coli urine isolates. The evaluation included 99 E. coli isolates from urine samples with diversity in age, sex, and antibiotic susceptibility. Predictions were evaluated for 14 antibiotics using patient metadata and susceptibility results for 4-8 antibiotics as input. Prediction uncertainty was handled using conformal prediction, allowing abstention when confidence was insufficient. EUCAST disk diffusion test results were used as reference and genomic sequence data was used to explore mechanisms of the AI performance. Without conformal prediction, 84% of predictions were correct when susceptibility results of six antibiotics were used to predict susceptibility to eight additional antibiotics. Across all predictions generated using susceptibility results for six antibiotics as input, the major and very major error rates were 19% and 12%, respectively. Prediction errors varied between antibiotics and were associated with certain phenotypic and genotypic resistance patterns. Conformal prediction reduced errors but increased abstentions; at confidence levels of 90%, 95%, and 97.5%, the model abstained in 9.6%, 14%, and 22% of instances. The method showed promising performance, but its clinical use remains limited and may require diagnostic data beyond susceptibility test results and demographic variables.

Automatic coding from clinical notes has been studied extensively for International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes, yet broad Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) and Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System (HCPCS) recommendation remains comparatively underexplored. Existing studies often focus on one specialty, a limited code vocabulary, or a single model family, leaving it unclear how different artificial intelligence (AI) paradigms perform under a common, clinically meaningful evaluation. We formulate CPT and HCPCS coding as an AI-assisted recommendation task in which a physician or professional coder reviews a short, ranked list of candidate codes supported by the clinical note. Using operative notes from Vanderbilt University Medical Center (VUMC) and discharge summaries from Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV), we compare lexical retrieval, Clinical-Longformer, GPT-5.6-Sol, MedGemma-27B, and an inspectable agentic-style retrieve-and-verify system under a controlled review budget. Micro-averaged recall within a fixed number of recommendations measures whether reference codes reach the reviewable list; micro-F1 is reported only where reference labels are sufficiently complete. Zero-shot GPT-5.6-Sol achieves the highest recall within five and ten candidates: 0.717 and 0.800 on VUMC and lower-bound values of 0.689 and 0.738 on MIMIC-IV. The retrieve-and-verify system reaches 0.695 and 0.784 on VUMC and lower-bound values of 0.575 and 0.657 on MIMIC-IV, with a candidate-linked evidence window attached to each retained recommendation. Diagnostic analyses reveal distinct failure sources, including output-length underfilling, confusion among closely related codes, out-of-knowledge-base generation, and incomplete evidence support. These findings establish a systematic evaluation framework for procedure-code recommendation and identify practical requirements for future systems that are accurate, review-efficient, and grounded in clinical evidence.

Artificial intelligence applied to routine electrocardiograms (ECGs) has largely focused on detecting existing disease or predicting individual cardiovascular outcomes. Whether ECGs can support prediction of multiple future diseases across organ systems remains unclear. We developed ECG-RISK, a multitask survival model for 67 incident three-character ICD-10 endpoints using ECG waveforms, demographic characteristics and routinely collected laboratory data from 86,673 MIMIC-IV patients. Discrimination was highest for heart, brain, kidney and lung endpoints, with organ-level C-indices ranging from 0.796 to 0.825, whereas liver and pancreatic endpoints showed lower discrimination. The ECG-only model achieved strong discrimination across most endpoints, whereas the incremental improvement gained by incorporating ECG and laboratory inputs beyond demographic information varied substantially across endpoints. Across the nine exploratory aggregated outcomes, Kaplan Meier curves showed clear separation among model-score tertiles. Discrimination was highest for dementia (C-index, 0.891) and heart failure (C-index, 0.857). These findings support the feasibility of ECG-based longitudinal risk prediction across multiple diseases. External validation and competing-risk analyses are required to assess generalisability and clinical utility.

BACKGROUND Generative AI (genAI) chart summarization tools embedded in electronic health records (EHRs) are being rapidly deployed across U.S. health systems. Although these tools represent a promising solution to alleviate cognitive burdens, their effects have not been examined in randomized-clinical trials (RCTs). METHODS In this pragmatic RCT at a single academic health system, 284 outpatient clinicians across forty-two specialties were assigned 1:1 to Epic's outpatient chart summarization tool or a usual-care control arm over 90 days, from February 23 to May 23, 2026. The primary outcome was physician task load (PTL) adapted for pre-charting. Prespecified exploratory outcomes included additional validated psychometrics as well as usability, safety, and time-based measures. Descriptive statistics included interaction and usage of the tool. RESULTS Of 74,474 AI chart summaries generated, 14.2% were interacted with by a clinician; the proportion of generated summaries interacted with declined from 21.5% in month 1 to 10.5% in month 3, and the proportion of clinicians using the tool at least once per month declined from 88.7% to 66.2%. The adjusted between-arm difference in PTL at follow-up favored the intervention arm (scale 0-400; -27.4; 95% CI, -49.4 to -5.3; P=0.02). Among the Professional Fulfillment Index (PFI; scale 0-4, lower=better) psychometrics, overall burnout (-0.20; 95% CI, -0.38 to -0.01) and work exhaustion (-0.24; 95% CI, -0.47 to -0.02) were lower in the intervention arm, with little difference in overall professional fulfillment (+0.04; 95% CI, -0.16 to 0.25). Charting time per encounter showed no significant between-arm difference during steady state (-1.2 seconds; 95% CI, -19.0 to 16.6). The net promoter score was -22, indicating that on average, clinicians did not recommend the tool. Among free-text respondents, 57.1% reported at least one concern, most commonly tool limitations or inaccurate information. No adverse patient safety events or near-misses were reported. CONCLUSION An EHR-integrated AI chart summarization tool modestly reduced physician task load and was associated with lower burnout, without time savings and against declining engagement. Sustained usage and oversight of reported inaccuracies remain open challenges.

The widespread adoption of clinical large language models (LLMs) introduces significant risks of automation bias, premature closure, and clinician deskilling. Current interpretability paradigms, including latent space trajectories, Concept Activation Vectors, and Concept Bottleneck Models, suffer from topological stagnation, metric distortion, and epistemic occlusion, frequently masking intermediate diagnostic uncertainty behind falsely confident outputs. To address these structural vulnerabilities, this paper introduces a novel closed-loop, multi-agent framework designed to quantify and visualize dynamic epistemic uncertainty in clinical LLM reasoning. By coupling predictive Shannon entropy with non-linear Isometric Feature Mapping (ISOMAP), the architecture projects high-dimensional inference state vectors onto a calibrated two-dimensional latent space, thereby assigning a quantifiable thermodynamic energy state to the reasoning path to track diagnostic velocity, cognitive momentum, and trajectory efficiency across sequential diagnostic rounds. Pilot validation across representative emergency medicine scenarios demonstrated distinct topological and information-theoretic behaviors: unconfounded cases (cerebellar infarction) exhibited smooth geodesic progression toward the ground truth alongside monotonic Shannon entropy decay from 2.15 to 1.74; noisy environments with ambiguous findings (spontaneous pneumothorax) suffered from trajectory wandering, local minimum traps, and high sustained entropy (~2.41) due to insufficient repulsive weighting for negative evidence; and triage-conflicted cases (acute cholangitis) achieved precise geometric proximity to the true node but experienced top-1 rank stagnation because the model conflated acute severity triage (sepsis) with anatomical etiology. By rendering machine hesitation and cognitive divergence visually auditable before final diagnostic crystallization, this geometric-information framework enables dynamic trust calibration and human-AI co-regulation at the point of care while establishing a clear mathematical foundation for future architectural interventions, such as dual-channel safety decoupling and non-linear repulsive weighting. Moving forward, validating these architectural enhancements across large-scale electronic health record databases and prospective clinical trials will be essential to realize its full clinical utility, establishing a foundational blueprint for safe, transparent, and cognitively synergistic AI integration in future medical practice. By rendering the LLM's reasoning process visually auditable, this framework lays the groundwork for capturing and externalizing the clinician's own cognitive patterns within the AI, forming a coupled system. This enables the explicit visualization of cognitive gaps between physician hypotheses and AI inferences, transforming the interaction from simple answer-checking into a dynamic learning process for both human and machine that prevents diagnostic oversight. Ultimately, because the responsibility for final clinical decision-making remains with the human practitioner, this framework serves as a vital decision-support mechanism. Moving forward, validating these architectural enhancements across large-scale electronic health record databases and prospective clinical trials will be essential to realize its full clinical utility, establishing a foundational blueprint for safe, transparent, and cognitively synergistic AI integration in future medical practice.

Large language models perform well on medical examinations, but users routinely challenge their answers and invoke professional roles, and it is unclear what a system does when a medical credential and a stated task-specific accuracy point in opposite directions. In a factorial experiment on 480 items from four Polish specialty examination sets and three consumer large language model systems (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini), each item and system received eleven independent conversations. Conditions crossed attributed source role (medical student, experienced specialist), stated prior accuracy on similar questions (2/10, 8/10) and suggestion correctness. The primary outcome was adoption of a prespecified incorrect option when the baseline answer matched the official key, comparing a specialist described as 2/10 with a student described as 8/10. Baseline agreement with the key was 87.2% across 15,683 analyzable conversations. The incorrect option was adopted more often from the specialist described as 2/10 than from the student described as 8/10 (10.2% vs. 7.6%; adjusted risk difference +2.82 percentage points, 95% CI +0.65 to +4.99). Estimates varied across the three systems and only one system-specific interval excluded zero. In a prespecified exploratory analysis with a shared eligibility rule, correct suggestions were adopted far more often than incorrect ones (risk difference +35.7 percentage points, 95% CI +30.8 to +40.7), indicating selective rather than indiscriminate compliance. An incorrect suggestion from a specialist with low stated accuracy was therefore slightly more influential than the same suggestion from a student with high stated accuracy, although the difference was modest and varied across systems. Agreement reached only after a user has disclosed a preferred answer should not automatically be treated as an independent second opinion, and medical large language model systems should be evaluated on how they revise answers after such disclosure, not solely on initial accuracy.

Background: Traditional real-world studies comparing SGLT2 and DPP4 inhibitors on renal outcomes rely on propensity score matching, which causes high-dimensional data loss. We used causal machine learning (Causal ML) to unmask heterogeneous treatment effects in diabetic kidney disease (DKD). Methods: Using data from 4,588 patients within the Japanese J-CKD-DB-Ex registry, we implemented a doubly robust (DR) learning framework (Linear DR-learner with XGBoost) to compare SGLT2 and DPP4 inhibitors. Outcomes included the chronic eGFR slope and a composite renal endpoint ([≥] 50% eGFR decline or end-stage kidney disease). Heterogeneity was explored via causal SHAP and decision trees. Results: At the population level, SGLT2 inhibitors modestly slowed chronic eGFR decline (average treatment effect [ATE] = 0.14 [95% CI: -0.86, 1.15] mL/min/1.73m^2/year) and reduced composite endpoint risk by 9% (ATE: -0.09 [-0.11, -0.08]) versus DPP4 inhibitors. However, individual-level counterfactual analysis suggested that for the chronic eGFR slope, non-glinide users with stable pre-treatment trajectories who were also taking ACE inhibitors had a greater benefit from SGLT2 inhibitors (ATE: 2.95 [-0.68, 6.58]). Conversely, glinide users with steep pre-treatment decline had a greater benefit from DPP4 inhibitors (ATE: -8.98 [-16.11, -1.85]). For composite renal events, SGLT2 inhibitors had a 28% absolute risk reduction within the algorithmically identified high-risk subgroup (eGFR [≤] 28.1 mL/min/1.73 m^2 and positive proteinuria; ATE: -0.28 [-0.33, -0.23]). Even non-proteinuric decliners demonstrated a 8% risk reduction with SGLT2 inhibitors (ATE: -0.08 [-0.10, -0.06]). Conclusion: Causal ML advances precision medicine in DKD, shifting from uniform prescribing to individualized, data-driven therapy targeting distinct intrarenal pathways.

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used by clinicians and patients for medical queries, yet their accuracy and safety at the specialist level in hematology remain insufficiently characterised. We benchmarked ten frontier proprietary and open-weight LLMs across two generations on 1,477 board-style hematology multiple-choice questions (MCQs) derived from five educational datasets spanning nine disease areas and six clinical skill domains, including text-only and multimodal case vignettes. Claude Opus 5 had the highest mean accuracy (92.7% text, 76.9% multimodal), followed closely by Gemini-3.1 Pro (91.4% and 78.7%), Gemini-3.6 Flash (91.0% and 74.8%) and GPT-5.6 Sol (89.9% and 76.7%). Accuracy significantly correlated with model size both for text-only and multimodal MCQs. Between model generations, the largest improvements in accuracy were seen for open-weight models whereas proprietary models showed only marginal gains. In error analysis, top-performing models exhibited highly concordant failure patterns, suggesting shared limitations on challenging cases. Frontier LLMs exhibit substantial specialist hematology knowledge across diverse subspecialist domains and clinical skill sets. Yet, despite high accuracy on board-style questions in hematology, continuous expert-on-the-loop output monitoring is paramount.

Objective To measure the accuracy of clinical coding, clinician review, and a locally deployed large language model (LLM) in identifying alcohol, drug, and self-harm involvement in emergency department (ED) attendances, and quantify prevalence. Design Two-phase diagnostic accuracy study. In a validation week, the identification strategies were assessed against a conflict-adjudicated reference standard (n=2,256); the LLM was then applied to n=105,096 annual attendances at the same site. Setting UK Type 1 Emergency Department treating patients [&ge;]16yrs. Main outcome measures Prevalence quantification compared with the reference standard; sensitivity, specificity, and balanced accuracy of each strategy; monthly identification rates and adjusted annual prevalence. Results The reference standard identified 12.1% of attendances as involving alcohol, drugs, or self-harm (coding 6.0%; clinician 10.0%, LLM 15.6%). LLM balanced accuracy matched or outperformed clinician review in all three domains (alcohol 0.942 v 0.930, p=0.635; drug 0.959 v 0.791, p<0.001; self-harm 0.982 v 0.908, p=0.004). Coding recorded 1.07 domains per identified patient against 1.32 in the reference standard. Adjusted annual prevalence corresponded to 12,890 domain involvements per year not identifiable in coded data. Subdomain classification found at least 81.6% of self-harm attendances required medical assessment for injury or overdose before psychiatric review. Conclusions Clinical coding identified fewer than half of presentations involving alcohol, drugs, and self-harm and rarely captured co-occurring domains; under-recording was present across a full year. A locally deployed LLM generated more complete structured data from existing clinical text within NHS infrastructure, at a scale which is not feasible for manual review.

Importance: Evidence on GLP-1/GIP therapies is largely derived from trials enrolling selected populations or medical records that miss utilization outside healthcare channels. No nationally representative cohort has characterized real-world uptake, indications, and access. Objective: To characterize GLP-1/GIP prevalence, indication, clinical profile, and access. Design: Prospective cohort study with three GLP-1/GIP surveillance waves (March 2024, December 2024, October 2025). Setting: The Understanding America Study, an address-based, nationally representative panel of approximately 15,000 US adults aged 18+ years initiated in 2014. Participants: UAS participants responding to at least one surveillance wave (n=9150). Exposures: GLP-1/GIP use status (never vs any use, comprising current and former use), self-reported primary indication (diabetes, weight loss, or other), and access pathway (traditional vs non-traditional). Main Outcomes and Measures: Survey-weighted prevalence of GLP-1/GIP use, overall and by indication and access pathway; sociodemographic, cardiometabolic, treatment, and access characteristics; and smartwatch-derived resting heart rate, heart rate variability, maximum activity heart rate, step count, and sleep duration and variability. Results: Among n=9150 adults (1274 with any use; 60.9% female; median age 53 years), weighted prevalence increased 46%, from 8.2% (March 2024) to 12.0% (October 2025) representing 32 million. Weight-loss indications grew, reaching nearly half of use (4.1% to 5.6%); diabetes-indicated use was stable (5.3% to 5.4%). Users carried high cardiometabolic burden (obesity, 68.2%; diabetes, 53.6%) but diverged by indication: diabetes-indicated users were older (median, 59 vs 49 years), whereas weight-loss-indicated users were more often female (69.9% vs 51.3%) and healthier. One in three users (~9 million) had non-traditional access, especially in weight-loss-indicated users, of whom 33% had no conventional prescription; 41% used compounding, online, or foreign pharmacies; and, 43% lacked coverage. Non-traditional users were five times as likely to report an unlisted, likely compounded formulation (19.8% vs 4.1%). All p<0.05. Conclusions and Relevance: Real-world GLP-1/GIP use has grown rapidly and diversified substantially in indication, access, and population profile. One in 3 users obtained treatment through nontraditional channels largely invisible to claims data, raising long-term safety, efficacy, and coverage questions. GLIMMER provides a public, nationally representative longitudinal evidence base for future payer and provider decisions.

Improvements in data availability, sharing, and integration, together with the development of explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) techniques, are advancing precision medicine for pediatric cancer by facilitating diagnosis, biomarker discovery, and drug development. Data sharing commons and initiatives like the Childhood Cancer Data Initiative (CCDI) provide access to pediatric-specific genomic and clinical data cohorts and improve data availability for pediatric cancer research. Based on CCDI, a scalable AI platform, Graph Artificial Intelligence for Pediatric Oncology (GAIPO), integrates various data modalities from bulk and single-cell omics data to clinical information. Such multi-modal data facilitates the training and development of advanced XAI models for pediatric cancers. We then developed an end-to-end multi-modality framework, PCGS, for pediatric cancer by incorporating omics-specific representation learning via GNN models with cross-attention fusion and multi-objective learning for downstream tasks such as classification, clustering, and survival analysis. This framework outperforms previous supervised multi-omics integration baseline approaches based on glioma and Wilms tumor cohorts and enables GNN model explainability via Shapley value-based feature attribution approaches to explain the contributions of gene-level features across various biomedical tasks, including classification and survival. Given specific background samples (e.g., age groups, sex, grades) as baselines, this explainable GNN model estimates and ranks the importance scores for input features from each omics modality. It identifies background-specific key features for biomarker discovery, risk group identification, and survival analysis in glioma and Wilms tumor, with potential applicability to other pediatric cancers.

Background: Pressure ulcers often develop complex three-dimensional morphologies that extend beyond the visible wound surface. Subsurface extensions such as tunneling and undermining create hidden cavities that complicate clinical assessment and wound management. Despite their clinical relevance, the prevalence and spatial characteristics of these subsurface wound morphologies have not been well characterized at scale. Methods: We performed a registry-based analysis using data from the LIFT-OFF Pressure Ulcer Registry, which captures longitudinal clinical documentation of pressure ulcers treated in routine care. The registry included approximately 18,000 patients with 32,000 documented pressure ulcers. Spatial characteristics of tunneling and undermining were analyzed using measurements recorded during routine wound assessments, including tract length, direction, and circumferential extent. Directional and circumferential distributions of subsurface defects were examined to characterize wound geometry. Results: Tunneling was present in 764 of 14,700 full-thickness pressure ulcers (5.2%), whereas undermining occurred in 2,293 wounds (15.6%). Tunneling tracts were typically short and exhibited directional clustering relative to the wound bed. In contrast, undermining demonstrated broader circumferential distributions and frequently involved larger subsurface separations beneath the wound margin. Both morphologies demonstrated distinct spatial patterns across anatomical locations and wound stages. Conclusion: Tunneling and undermining are common subsurface features of pressure ulcers and exhibit distinct spatial geometries. Whereas tunneling manifests as directional tract-like extensions, undermining more frequently produces circumferential tissue separation beneath wound margins. Improved characterization of subsurface wound architecture may enhance assessment of wound complexity and provide information not captured by surface measurements alone. Future studies should evaluate whether these features contribute to wound severity assessment, prognosis, and risk stratification.

Agentic workflows can coordinate modelling, but balancing predictive performance, measurement burden and reproducibility is unclear. We developed DXA Agent, an agentic workflow for dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) outcomes integrating planning, feature-model refinement, tools, provenance and hypothesis-generating interpretation. Models were independently developed and tested in UK Biobank (5,318 participants) and the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES; 3,777 participants), using cost-efficient and no-limit strategies. Across 20 UK Biobank and three NHANES bone mineral density sites, cost-efficient models achieved lower RMSE and higher R2 than the best conventional comparator, with median relative RMSE reductions of 10.9% and 9.9%, respectively. Classification was task dependent: UK Biobank osteoporosis averaged AUROC 0.839 and PR-AUC 0.182, whereas NHANES performance was comparable with conventional models. Higher-burden features did not consistently improve prediction. These retrospective, cohort-internal findings position DXA Agent as an inspectable, measurement-burden-aware research workflow requiring independent prospective validation.

SysBio FAIRplex is a Common Fund Venture Program that catalogs and indexes data from the Accelerating Medicines Partnership(R) (AMP(R)) Program through a federated model in which data hosts retain custody of their datasets. The central piece of this work is the SysBio Common Data Model (SysBio CDM). AMP is a precompetitive public-private partnership started in 2014 that unites the resources of NIH and private partners to improve our understanding of disease pathways and transform current models for developing new treatments by: - identifying new targets, biomarkers, and development paradigms; - developing leading-edge tools and technologies; - collecting large-scale datasets and supporting analytics for open analysis by the public; and - generating consensus platforms and procedures. A multidisciplinary Task Force was chartered to design the SysBio CDM by extending the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) Common Data Model into the -omics domain. The Task Force produced a Minimum Viable Product comprising nine OMOP tables; four extension tables for assay and file metadata; and a Common Data Element (CDE) Registry to specify field semantics. This manuscript describes the deliverable: the underlying design choices, the criteria applied in selecting and constructing the extension tables, how the extended model supports multimodal data integration across AMP projects, and what further work to support additional -omics modalities would entail. As an auxiliary methodology, the paper also describes the AI-assisted CDE harmonization workflow used to populate the model.

Surgical video interpretation is a promising medical artificial intelligence application. However, no existing video annotation method preserves the spatiotemporal complexity of surgeon reasoning. Here we show that verbal reasoning and visual attention can be converted into structured, machine-actionable records of intraoperative behaviours. Our method decomposes transcribed verbal commentary into video-anchored semantic feedback chunks, which are classified via a large language model, with spatial grounding to surgical scenes via eyegaze or cursor tracking. We demonstrate method validity and scalability on structured and unstructured annotation tasks. For quality feedback on full-length colorectal procedures, the method reached near-human fidelity for chunking (mean cosine similarity: 0.95, SD: 0.01) and semantic classification across observations (mean Cohen's kappa: 0.71, SD: 0.07) and evaluative triggers (mean Cohen's kappa: 0.67, SD: 0.14), with excellent usability ratings. For structured critical view of safety assessment in laparoscopic cholecystectomy, implicit annotation yielded excellent agreement with explicit reviewer ratings (Cohen's kappa: 0.83, 0.49 and 0.81 across three criteria). We anticipate this method will advance surgical data science by enabling scalable construction of meaningfully annotated surgical video datasets.

Background: Consumer use of AI chatbots for health advice is rising, yet triage safety relative to established services remains unclear. Australia's Healthdirect, a government-backed symptom checker with 2.4 million uses in FY2024-25, remains unevaluated against frontier large language models (LLMs), and whether premium subscriptions improve triage safety remains unexplored. This study compared the triage accuracy and safety of Healthdirect against six LLM configurations across ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini, assessed whether paid subscriptions improve triage safety, and characterised each system's error patterns. Methods: Forty-five clinical vignettes from the Semigran et al. benchmark spanning emergency, non-emergent, and self-care categories (15 each) were evaluated across seven systems. Healthdirect was tested following a seven-rule interaction protocol. LLMs were evaluated using first-person patient-language prompts under free-tier and paid-tier conditions. Outcomes were triage accuracy, emergency sensitivity, under-triage, and critical misses, analysed using Cochran's Q, Bonferroni-corrected McNemar tests, Cohen's kappa, and Wilson intervals. Findings: Triage accuracy differed significantly (Cochran's Q = 36.79, p < 0.001). Healthdirect achieved 48.9% accuracy (95% CI 35.0% to 63.0%; kappa = 0.233) versus 73.3% to 86.7% for LLMs (kappa = 0.600 to 0.800). Healthdirect operated under conservative interactive defaults while LLMs received complete information in a single prompt, which may have disadvantaged Healthdirect. Emergency sensitivity was 46.7% versus 80.0% to 86.7% for LLMs. Healthdirect produced two critical misses; no LLM produced any across 270 evaluations (95% CI 0% to 1.4%). When LLMs undertriaged, they recommended GP care rather than self-care. No tier differences were significant (all p > 0.05), and most systems over-triaged self-care cases. Interpretation: Frontier LLMs demonstrated higher triage accuracy and safer error profiles than Healthdirect. All LLMs avoided critical misses; Healthdirect did not. Premium subscriptions did not significantly improve triage safety. These findings support clinical governance decisions about whether LLMs warrant formal evaluation alongside government-backed symptom checkers.